Triple
T37228858
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Harmony Smurf |
E923075
|
entity |
| Predicate | definingFlaw |
P95465
|
FINISHED |
| Object | lack of musical talent |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lack of musical talent | Statement: [Harmony Smurf, definingFlaw, lack of musical talent]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: definingFlaw Context triple: [Harmony Smurf, definingFlaw, lack of musical talent]
-
A.
defect
chosen
Indicates that an entity has a fault, imperfection, or malfunction that causes it to deviate from an expected standard or proper functioning.
-
B.
fault
Indicates that one entity is responsible or at blame for a problem, error, or undesirable outcome involving another entity or situation.
-
C.
reasonForDefect
Indicates the cause or underlying reason that led to the occurrence of a particular defect.
-
D.
defectsFrom
Indicates a relationship where an entity abandons, deserts, or switches allegiance away from another entity, often to join an opposing side.
-
E.
faultRequirement
Indicates that one entity specifies, constrains, or defines a required fault condition or fault-related behavior for another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ea7f0008190b31b8e30f3d05a71 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fef5cf8da881908260ec633830375d |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fef455e40481909861c82007b79bc0 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:46 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.