Triple

T37223048
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ACME products E922935 entity
Predicate commonOutcomeFor P199477 FINISHED
Object Wile E. Coyote's schemes fail LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Wile E. Coyote's schemes fail | Statement: [ACME products, commonOutcomeFor, Wile E. Coyote's schemes fail]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commonOutcomeFor
Context triple: [ACME products, commonOutcomeFor, Wile E. Coyote's schemes fail]
  • A. canonicalOutcome
    Indicates that an event, process, or interaction leads to its standard, primary, or officially recognized result or consequence.
  • B. outcomeOf
    Indicates that one entity is the result, consequence, or product that arises from another entity, event, or process.
  • C. preDeterminedOutcomes
    Indicates that the outcomes of an event or process are fixed in advance and not influenced by subsequent actions or conditions.
  • D. outcomeType
    Indicates the specific category or nature of the result produced by an event, process, or action.
  • E. supportedOutcomeOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as evidence, backing, or justification for the outcome or result represented by another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ea7f0008190b31b8e30f3d05a71 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff3b32ee148190a3ba3b7600943fef completed May 9, 2026, 1:48 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff3a238af88190a2c2245e30299e48 completed May 9, 2026, 1:44 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ff3b323a748190827165f1cb274141 completed May 9, 2026, 1:48 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.