Triple
T37185206
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | supreme criminal court |
E921302
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalSystemFunction |
P25070
|
FINISHED |
| Object | final arbiter in criminal matters |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: final arbiter in criminal matters | Statement: [supreme criminal court, legalSystemFunction, final arbiter in criminal matters]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalSystemFunction Context triple: [supreme criminal court, legalSystemFunction, final arbiter in criminal matters]
-
A.
legalSystemFeature
chosen
Indicates a characteristic, rule, or structural element that forms part of a particular legal system.
-
B.
legalSystem
Indicates the formal framework of laws, rules, and institutions that governs how legal matters are defined, interpreted, and enforced within a society or jurisdiction.
-
C.
legalSystemBasis
Indicates the foundational legal framework, tradition, or set of principles on which a legal system is based.
-
D.
legalSystemDepictedAs
Indicates that one entity portrays, represents, or characterizes a legal system in a particular way or form.
-
E.
legalSystemImposed
Indicates that one authority or group has established and enforced a particular legal system upon another population or territory.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ea250bc819083f28d81de25cd0c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fff09dae088190bd8460060d778feb |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fff0027c5c8190baa5c7a15852cbe0 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:40 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.