Triple
T37167834
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | supreme civil court |
E920835
|
entity |
| Predicate | decisionCanBeChallengedOnlyBy |
P187654
|
FINISHED |
| Object | constitutional mechanisms if available |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: constitutional mechanisms if available | Statement: [supreme civil court, decisionCanBeChallengedOnlyBy, constitutional mechanisms if available]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: decisionCanBeChallengedOnlyBy Context triple: [supreme civil court, decisionCanBeChallengedOnlyBy, constitutional mechanisms if available]
-
A.
canBeChallengedOn
Indicates that one entity’s claim, decision, or status is open to being questioned, disputed, or formally contested by another entity.
-
B.
decisionEnforceableIn
Indicates that a particular decision is legally valid and can be executed or enforced within a specified jurisdiction or context.
-
C.
branchChallenged
Indicates that one branch or offshoot has been questioned, disputed, or formally contested by another party or authority.
-
D.
stateChallenged
Indicates that a state or condition is being questioned, disputed, or formally contested by another party.
-
E.
decisionSubjectToAppealOn
Indicates that a particular decision is open to being challenged or reviewed through an appeal process.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ea16f288190b445aa1604d996f4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fb78cbef988190b8f79d946b46e6b2 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fb5a9ac5a08190b24ef308963fc52b |
completed | May 6, 2026, 3:13 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fb78c982ac8190846efe8f6209e5d1 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.