Triple
T37149051
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | NFS over RDMA |
E920315
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | network file system protocol variant |
C56679
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: network file system protocol variant Context triple: [NFS over RDMA, instanceOf, network file system protocol variant]
-
A.
network file system software
Network file system software enables users and applications to access and manage files over a network as if they were stored on a local disk, providing shared, remote storage with centralized control.
-
B.
NFS protocol specification
The NFS protocol specification defines the rules, message formats, and procedures that enable networked systems to access and manage remote files as if they were on a local filesystem.
-
C.
file sharing protocol
chosen
A file sharing protocol is a set of rules and procedures that enables computers to locate, request, transfer, and manage files over a network in a standardized and interoperable way.
-
D.
FAT file system variant
A FAT file system variant is a specific implementation or extension of the File Allocation Table architecture that defines how data is organized, stored, and managed on storage media, often differing in cluster size limits, maximum volume and file sizes, and supported features.
-
E.
union file system
A union file system is a filesystem service that overlays multiple directories or filesystems into a single unified view, allowing their contents to appear merged while preserving the underlying sources.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e9f87c08190b4c8f7fafbd8345a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.