Triple

T37134165
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Memories E919608 entity
Predicate melodicInterpolationOf P187181 FINISHED
Object Pachelbel's Canon in D NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pachelbel's Canon in D | Statement: [Memories, melodicInterpolationOf, Pachelbel's Canon in D]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: melodicInterpolationOf
Context triple: [Memories, melodicInterpolationOf, Pachelbel's Canon in D]
  • A. melodicPattern
    Indicates a recurring sequence of musical tones or intervals that forms a recognizable melodic structure within a piece.
  • B. melodicContour
    Indicates the pattern of pitch movement over time in a musical line, describing how notes rise, fall, or stay level relative to one another.
  • C. isMelodic
    Indicates that something possesses a tuneful, harmonious, or musically pleasing quality.
  • D. melodyMeter
    Indicates a relationship where a melody is associated with, or structured according to, a specific metrical pattern or time signature.
  • E. hasMoreMelodicSoundThan
    Indicates that the sound produced by one entity is judged to be more melodic, tuneful, or musically pleasing than the sound produced by another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e9d13e48190a108f7fbf80ff375 completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fb344c60f8819090f2e21e1e61d621 completed May 6, 2026, 12:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fb2f642db08190b562725502c74ea6 completed May 6, 2026, 12:09 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fb344ba5408190a6fe8face293d88b completed May 6, 2026, 12:30 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.