Triple
T3707537
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | will to power |
E80928
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedToCritique |
P50924
|
FINISHED |
| Object | traditional morality |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: traditional morality | Statement: [will to power, usedToCritique, traditional morality]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedToCritique Context triple: [will to power, usedToCritique, traditional morality]
-
A.
aimsToCritique
Indicates an intention to analyze and point out faults, limitations, or weaknesses in something.
-
B.
hasCriticism
Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval, objection, or negative evaluation directed toward another entity.
-
C.
criticizedFor
Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval or negative judgment of another entity specifically because of a particular action, quality, or outcome.
-
D.
criticizesSource
Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval of, or negative judgment about, the content, behavior, or credibility of another entity that is treated as a source.
-
E.
judgedBy
Indicates that one entity evaluates, assesses, or forms an opinion about another entity, often in an official or critical capacity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b1793888190a5f70e4b21dc05a1 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc57edd748190a006e15fa0248679 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adc041a8608190a2d543dab6d2ef6c |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69adc133ef50819094c2b971f31f1615 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:33 p.m.