Triple

T37074949
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Carnot engine E917683 entity
Predicate hasEfficiencySymbol P187471 FINISHED
Object η LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: η | Statement: [Carnot engine, hasEfficiencySymbol, η]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEfficiencySymbol
Context triple: [Carnot engine, hasEfficiencySymbol, η]
  • A. hasEfficiencyMetric
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific measure or metric used to evaluate its efficiency.
  • B. hasMaximumEfficiencyAt
    Indicates that an entity reaches or exhibits its highest possible efficiency under a specified condition, context, or parameter value.
  • C. claimedEfficiency
    Indicates that an entity asserts or reports a certain level of efficiency, regardless of whether that efficiency is verified or actual.
  • D. isMoreEfficientThan
    Indicates that one entity performs a task or uses resources in a way that achieves the same or better outcome with less time, effort, or cost than another entity.
  • E. energyEfficiencyList
    Indicates that an entity is included in a list or classification based on its level of energy efficiency.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e9771e08190a690834e3cd20654 completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fb55de3b9c8190a7656aeab3c3ffbc completed May 6, 2026, 2:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fb35bc92e08190bff447624e2df791 completed May 6, 2026, 12:36 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fb55dc36d08190a0634fa680e13114 completed May 6, 2026, 2:53 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:14 p.m.