Triple
T3705858
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gimel |
E80890
|
entity |
| Predicate | canRepresentSoftSoundInSomeTraditions |
P35086
|
FINISHED |
| Object | gh |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: gh | Statement: [Gimel, canRepresentSoftSoundInSomeTraditions, gh]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canRepresentSoftSoundInSomeTraditions Context triple: [Gimel, canRepresentSoftSoundInSomeTraditions, gh]
-
A.
hasNasalVowels
Indicates that the subject language or phonological system includes vowels that are produced with nasal airflow (nasalized vowels).
-
B.
hasPhonologicalBasisFor
Indicates that one entity serves as the phonological source, motivation, or foundation for another entity.
-
C.
hasAlternativeVocalization
chosen
Indicates that an entity has another valid way it can be vocalized or pronounced, distinct from its primary or standard vocalization.
-
D.
hasVowelNotationSystem
Indicates that a writing or transcription system for a language includes a method for explicitly representing vowel sounds.
-
E.
hasOwnPhonology
Indicates that an entity possesses its own distinct phonological system or set of sound patterns, separate from those of other entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b1793888190a5f70e4b21dc05a1 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc54ce1788190ac000793cbdaba48 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adc041a8608190a2d543dab6d2ef6c |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:33 p.m.