Triple

T3704550
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cohens v. Virginia E80859 entity
Predicate followedDoctrineOf P27401 FINISHED
Object judicial review established in Marbury v. Madison LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: judicial review established in Marbury v. Madison | Statement: [Cohens v. Virginia, followedDoctrineOf, judicial review established in Marbury v. Madison]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: followedDoctrineOf
Context triple: [Cohens v. Virginia, followedDoctrineOf, judicial review established in Marbury v. Madison]
  • A. followsDoctrine chosen
    Indicates that one entity adheres to, complies with, or acts in accordance with a specified doctrine or set of guiding principles.
  • B. doctrineOf
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is the doctrinal teaching, principle, or belief system associated with, derived from, or formally held by another entity.
  • C. encouragedDoctrine
    Indicates that an entity actively promoted or urged others to adopt or follow a particular doctrine or set of beliefs.
  • D. confirmedDoctrine
    Indicates that an authority has officially validated, endorsed, or ratified a particular doctrine as true or acceptable.
  • E. hasDoctrinalBasis
    Indicates that one concept, claim, or practice is grounded in, supported by, or derived from a specific doctrine or set of doctrines.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8b1793888190a5f70e4b21dc05a1 completed March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adc54bbfcc8190bec9c16e3749c3b1 completed March 8, 2026, 6:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adc041a8608190a2d543dab6d2ef6c completed March 8, 2026, 6:30 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:33 p.m.