Triple

T3704529
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cohens v. Virginia E80859 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object Philip J. Cohen and Mendes J. Cohen v. The Commonwealth of Virginia E80859 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Philip J. Cohen and Mendes J. Cohen v. The Commonwealth of Virginia | Statement: [Cohens v. Virginia, fullCaseName, Philip J. Cohen and Mendes J. Cohen v. The Commonwealth of Virginia]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Philip J. Cohen and Mendes J. Cohen v. The Commonwealth of Virginia
Context triple: [Cohens v. Virginia, fullCaseName, Philip J. Cohen and Mendes J. Cohen v. The Commonwealth of Virginia]
  • A. Boynton v. Virginia
    Boynton v. Virginia was a 1960 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended federal prohibitions against racial discrimination in interstate bus terminals, helping lay the legal groundwork for the Freedom Rides.
  • B. Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman
    Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman is a 1988 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down Virginia’s residency requirement for bar admission on motion as a violation of the Privileges and Immunities Clause.
  • C. Cohens v. Virginia chosen
    Cohens v. Virginia is an 1821 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed the Court’s authority to review state criminal proceedings involving federal law, strengthening federal judicial power over the states.
  • D. Cooley v. Board of Wardens
    Cooley v. Board of Wardens is an 1852 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing states to regulate certain local aspects of commerce, such as port pilotage, without violating federal authority.
  • E. Morgan v. Virginia
    Morgan v. Virginia was a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down state laws mandating racial segregation on interstate buses, laying important groundwork for later civil rights actions.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8b1793888190a5f70e4b21dc05a1 completed March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adc54bbfcc8190bec9c16e3749c3b1 completed March 8, 2026, 6:51 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b4cdfada708190ba6ae04bad52bb2b completed March 14, 2026, 2:54 a.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:33 p.m.