Triple
T37021514
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Japanese Garden in Clingendael |
E916232
|
entity |
| Predicate | maintenanceFocus |
P44488
|
FINISHED |
| Object | preservation of original design |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: preservation of original design | Statement: [Japanese Garden in Clingendael, maintenanceFocus, preservation of original design]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: maintenanceFocus Context triple: [Japanese Garden in Clingendael, maintenanceFocus, preservation of original design]
-
A.
maintenanceType
Indicates the specific category or kind of maintenance activity associated with an entity or relationship.
-
B.
maintenance
Indicates that an entity performs, requires, or is involved in upkeep, repair, or preservation activities for another entity or system.
-
C.
maintenancePractice
Indicates the specific actions or methods used to preserve, repair, or optimize the condition or performance of something over time.
-
D.
maintenanceFeature
Indicates that one entity serves as a maintenance-related feature, capability, or component associated with another entity.
-
E.
maintenanceConcept
chosen
Indicates a conceptual or abstract relationship related to maintenance activities, strategies, or principles rather than a specific maintenance event.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e920dc48190acb6bb7ebc4dffab |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd0b92f42881908cd77e3f058adcc2 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd0a3d68d4819094d92040f7c48d7c |
completed | May 7, 2026, 9:55 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:14 p.m.