Triple

T3700815
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tom Walker E78572 entity
Predicate religiousHypocrisy P49475 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Tom Walker, religiousHypocrisy, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: religiousHypocrisy
Context triple: [Tom Walker, religiousHypocrisy, yes]
  • A. religiousCritic
    Indicates that one entity criticizes, challenges, or expresses disapproval of another entity on religious grounds or regarding religious beliefs, practices, or institutions.
  • B. religiousElement
    Indicates that something is a component, aspect, or feature associated with a religion or religious practice.
  • C. religiousAttitude
    Indicates an entity’s stance, disposition, or orientation toward religion or religious beliefs.
  • D. bearerReligion
    Indicates that a bearer (such as a person or entity) adheres to, practices, or is associated with a particular religion.
  • E. religiousConsequence
    Indicates a relationship where one event, action, or state leads to an outcome specifically defined or understood in religious terms (such as divine reward, punishment, obligation, or spiritual effect).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85e3b1888190abc983e06968696d completed March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adc514eb6c8190b3b74a603c717729 completed March 8, 2026, 6:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adb84dc5808190850aa6975cb09e27 completed March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69adb903be308190a8f1925f99e67c68 completed March 8, 2026, 5:59 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:26 p.m.