Triple

T36985984
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 2000 United States Senate election in Connecticut E914962 entity
Predicate endOfTermForWinner P89926 FINISHED
Object 2007-01-03 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2007-01-03 | Statement: [2000 United States Senate election in Connecticut, endOfTermForWinner, 2007-01-03]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: endOfTermForWinner
Context triple: [2000 United States Senate election in Connecticut, endOfTermForWinner, 2007-01-03]
  • A. termStartOfWinner
    Indicates the starting date or point in time of the winner’s term in a given role or position.
  • B. officeTermEndOfWinner chosen
    Indicates the date or point in time when the winning candidate’s term in office concludes.
  • C. endOfTermOnCourt
    Indicates the point in time when an individual's service or tenure on a court officially concludes.
  • D. endOfTermContested
    Indicates that the conclusion or expiration of a term (such as a contract, office, or agreement) is being disputed or formally challenged.
  • E. winnerManager
    Indicates that one entity is the manager or supervisor of another entity who is the winner in a given context or competition.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e8dd0408190b8b46da118ea5128 completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fb154c0fe08190a2e41e7a29b6055f completed May 6, 2026, 10:17 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f9fecc005c8190be082a8689193745 completed May 5, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:14 p.m.