Triple
T36977569
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 |
E914740
|
entity |
| Predicate | budgetContext |
P186834
|
FINISHED |
| Object | part of 1997 budget reconciliation process |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: part of 1997 budget reconciliation process | Statement: [Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, budgetContext, part of 1997 budget reconciliation process]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: budgetContext Context triple: [Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, budgetContext, part of 1997 budget reconciliation process]
-
A.
budgetType
Indicates the classification or category of a budget associated with an entity or financial activity.
-
B.
budget
Indicates that an entity allocates, plans, or assigns specific financial resources for another entity, activity, or time period.
-
C.
budgetAccount
Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with, charged to, or managed under a specific budget account for financial tracking or allocation.
-
D.
budgetScope
Indicates the extent or range of financial resources allocated or considered within a particular budget.
-
E.
budgetSession
Indicates a formal meeting or period dedicated to discussing, planning, or deciding on budgetary matters.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e8d13b4819089af24a47ce092fc |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fa0a7b00948190a257273d9968c5d7 |
completed | May 5, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f9fec9c9488190ae2a349651a02782 |
completed | May 5, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fa0a799b9081909bfa8293a22c4b00 |
completed | May 5, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:14 p.m.