Triple
T36973215
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | John McMillian |
E914623
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalDoctrineClarified |
P199791
|
FINISHED |
| Object | standard for excessive force claims by prisoners |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: standard for excessive force claims by prisoners | Statement: [John McMillian, legalDoctrineClarified, standard for excessive force claims by prisoners]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalDoctrineClarified Context triple: [John McMillian, legalDoctrineClarified, standard for excessive force claims by prisoners]
-
A.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
B.
legalDoctrineAffected
chosen
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is influenced, modified, or impacted by a specified action, decision, or event.
-
C.
legalDoctrineConfirmed
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine has been formally upheld, validated, or reaffirmed by an authoritative legal decision or body.
-
D.
legalConcept
Indicates a relationship where something is classified or treated as a concept defined and governed by law or legal theory.
-
E.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e8d13b4819089af24a47ce092fc |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ffe12ee59c8190bc7da386e6d5332d |
completed | May 10, 2026, 1:36 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ffe0a138bc8190a3d4b48cd579e985 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 1:34 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:14 p.m.