Triple

T36973013
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989) E914618 entity
Predicate pluralityOrMajority P186828 FINISHED
Object majority opinion LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: majority opinion | Statement: [Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989), pluralityOrMajority, majority opinion]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: pluralityOrMajority
Context triple: [Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989), pluralityOrMajority, majority opinion]
  • A. majorityVote
    Indicates that a decision or outcome is determined by the option receiving more than half of the votes among a group.
  • B. majorityType
    Indicates that one type or category constitutes more than half of the instances within a given set or context.
  • C. votedWithMajorityIn
    Indicates that an entity cast its vote in alignment with the majority decision within a given voting event or body.
  • D. majorityOrientation
    Indicates that one orientation or direction is held by more than half of the relevant entities in a given context.
  • E. majoritySeats
    Indicates that one party or group holds more than half of the available seats in a governing or decision-making body.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e8d13b4819089af24a47ce092fc completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fa0a7b00948190a257273d9968c5d7 completed May 5, 2026, 3:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f9fec9c9488190ae2a349651a02782 completed May 5, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fa0a799b9081909bfa8293a22c4b00 completed May 5, 2026, 3:19 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:14 p.m.