Triple
T36972704
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2007 Labour Party deputy leadership election |
E914611
|
entity |
| Predicate | narrowVictoryOver |
P129855
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Alan Johnson |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Alan Johnson | Statement: [2007 Labour Party deputy leadership election, narrowVictoryOver, Alan Johnson]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: narrowVictoryOver Context triple: [2007 Labour Party deputy leadership election, narrowVictoryOver, Alan Johnson]
-
A.
victoryIn
Indicates that one entity achieves a win or success in a specific contest, event, or competitive context involving another entity.
-
B.
defeatedByMargin
chosen
Indicates that one entity was defeated by another with a specified numerical margin or difference in score, votes, or performance.
-
C.
typeOfVictory
Indicates the specific manner or category in which a victory was achieved.
-
D.
wonBy
Indicates that a contest, game, or competition is decided in favor of a particular participant or side.
-
E.
wonAt
Indicates that one entity achieved victory or success in a specific event, competition, or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e8d13b4819089af24a47ce092fc |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fa0a7b00948190a257273d9968c5d7 |
completed | May 5, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f9fec9c9488190ae2a349651a02782 |
completed | May 5, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:14 p.m.