Triple

T36965512
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Heather Mason E914416 entity
Predicate hasEndingVariants P195844 FINISHED
Object multiple endings in Silent Hill 3 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: multiple endings in Silent Hill 3 | Statement: [Heather Mason, hasEndingVariants, multiple endings in Silent Hill 3]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEndingVariants
Context triple: [Heather Mason, hasEndingVariants, multiple endings in Silent Hill 3]
  • A. hasEnding
    Indicates that one entity concludes with, or terminates in, another entity (such as a specific substring, segment, or final component).
  • B. hasConditionalEnding
    Indicates that one entity concludes or terminates only if a specified condition involving another entity is met.
  • C. hasAmbiguousEnding
    Indicates that the event, story, or situation concludes in a way that is open to multiple interpretations or lacks a clear, definitive resolution.
  • D. setsEndingFor
    Indicates that one entity defines or assigns the concluding portion or final segment for another entity.
  • E. hasTypeOfEnding
    Indicates that one entity possesses or exhibits a particular kind or category of ending associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e8c498c8190b2842db80aea8b3b completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fde9fc184c8190bebef35df0e76076 completed May 8, 2026, 1:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fde6e5beb4819094945a695e961d88 completed May 8, 2026, 1:36 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fde9fb68388190ada4a7018e2a2f76 completed May 8, 2026, 1:49 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:14 p.m.