Triple

T36963871
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Grand Guard E914376 entity
Predicate enforcesRuleOf P113152 FINISHED
Object Duke Luca Abele NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Duke Luca Abele | Statement: [Grand Guard, enforcesRuleOf, Duke Luca Abele]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: enforcesRuleOf
Context triple: [Grand Guard, enforcesRuleOf, Duke Luca Abele]
  • A. enforcesRule chosen
    Indicates that one entity compels or ensures that another entity follows or complies with a specified rule or set of rules.
  • B. assumedRuleOf
    Indicates that one entity is presumed or taken to hold authoritative control, governance, or dominion over another entity, typically without definitive confirmation.
  • C. isRuleGoverned
    Indicates that an entity’s behavior, structure, or operation is determined and constrained by explicit rules or formal regulations.
  • D. underRule
    Indicates that one entity is governed, controlled, or subject to the authority, rules, or dominion of another entity.
  • E. enablesEnforcementOf
    Indicates that one entity provides the authority, means, or conditions necessary for another entity to carry out enforcement actions or apply rules.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e8c498c8190b2842db80aea8b3b completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fa0a7b00948190a257273d9968c5d7 completed May 5, 2026, 3:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f9fec9c9488190ae2a349651a02782 completed May 5, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:14 p.m.