Triple
T36962508
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Abbey of the Everyman |
E914343
|
entity |
| Predicate | viewOnMagic |
P191387
|
FINISHED |
| Object | considers magic heretical |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: considers magic heretical | Statement: [Abbey of the Everyman, viewOnMagic, considers magic heretical]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: viewOnMagic Context triple: [Abbey of the Everyman, viewOnMagic, considers magic heretical]
-
A.
viewOfMagic
chosen
Indicates a relationship where an entity holds a particular perspective, attitude, or interpretation regarding magic or magical practices.
-
B.
viewOnMundus
Indicates a perspective, opinion, or conceptual stance that something or someone holds regarding Mundus.
-
C.
viewOnRevelation
Indicates the stance or interpretation an entity holds regarding the nature, source, or authority of divine revelation.
-
D.
viewOnReality
Indicates a subject’s overarching perspective, interpretation, or conceptual stance regarding the nature of reality.
-
E.
viewOnEvil
Indicates a stance or perspective that an entity holds regarding what is considered evil.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e8c498c8190b2842db80aea8b3b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd35d108908190b79b1e8e6bbd62aa |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd34cb46108190b43c3b7f67ec4cd4 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:56 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:14 p.m.