Triple
T36954998
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Peppermint (Hi-Fi Rush) |
E914166
|
entity |
| Predicate | hacks |
P33464
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Vandelay Technologies infrastructure |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Vandelay Technologies infrastructure | Statement: [Peppermint (Hi-Fi Rush), hacks, Vandelay Technologies infrastructure]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hacks Context triple: [Peppermint (Hi-Fi Rush), hacks, Vandelay Technologies infrastructure]
-
A.
exploits
Indicates that one entity unfairly or selfishly uses another entity or resource for its own advantage or benefit.
-
B.
hijacked
chosen
Indicates that one entity has forcibly taken control of another entity, typically without authorization and against the will of its rightful controller.
-
C.
hits
Indicates a physical impact where one entity forcefully strikes or makes contact with another.
-
D.
leaks
Indicates that a substance, information, or resource escapes or is released unintentionally from its intended container, system, or source.
-
E.
gimmick
Indicates that an entity uses or features a novel, attention-grabbing trick or device primarily intended to attract interest rather than provide substantive value.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e8b28848190abd81fe7a7374910 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fa0a7b00948190a257273d9968c5d7 |
completed | May 5, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f9fec9c9488190ae2a349651a02782 |
completed | May 5, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:13 p.m.