Triple
T36923837
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Immalee |
E913279
|
entity |
| Predicate | entwinedWith |
P38166
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Melmoth the Wanderer |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Melmoth the Wanderer | Statement: [Immalee, entwinedWith, Melmoth the Wanderer]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: entwinedWith Context triple: [Immalee, entwinedWith, Melmoth the Wanderer]
-
A.
entangledWith
chosen
Indicates a mutual state in which two or more entities are so interconnected that a change or condition in one inherently affects or constrains the other(s).
-
B.
bondedWith
Indicates that two entities are joined by a strong, enduring connection or attachment, whether emotional, social, or structural.
-
C.
tieInWith
Indicates that one thing is connected, coordinated, or made consistent with another, often as part of a combined plan, theme, or schedule.
-
D.
actedTogetherWith
Indicates that two entities participated in the same performance or production, collaborating or appearing together in an acting context.
-
E.
heldTogetherWith
Indicates that two or more entities are physically joined or kept in contact by some binding, fastening, or cohesive force.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e885b848190bad82c87e9525486 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f9fdcee55c8190ac5c514365310457 |
completed | May 5, 2026, 2:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7cf79ddb08190a083405cccc14137 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:43 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:13 p.m.