Triple
T36917058
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Texas Tech vs Michigan State |
E913071
|
entity |
| Predicate | broadcasterTeam |
P187219
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jim Nantz |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jim Nantz | Statement: [Texas Tech vs Michigan State, broadcasterTeam, Jim Nantz]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: broadcasterTeam Context triple: [Texas Tech vs Michigan State, broadcasterTeam, Jim Nantz]
-
A.
broadcastingTeam
Indicates a relationship where a group or organization is responsible for producing and transmitting a broadcast (such as a TV, radio, or streaming program) to an audience.
-
B.
broadcastsTeam
Indicates that one entity transmits or airs content on behalf of, or about, a particular team.
-
C.
broadcasterAbbreviation
Indicates that an entity is identified by a specific abbreviated name used by a broadcaster.
-
D.
featuredTeam
Indicates that a particular team is highlighted or given special prominence in a given context or presentation.
-
E.
conferenceTeam1
Indicates that an entity participates in or is associated with the first team in a conference-related context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e885b848190bad82c87e9525486 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fb34e5576881909394355c8ec6ddd2 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 12:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fb2f6171e88190bf1e0ee6a644b6a9 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 12:09 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fb34e4906c8190abb1c293fb84329a |
completed | May 6, 2026, 12:32 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:13 p.m.