Triple

T36916164
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Australia–Japan relations E913049 entity
Predicate securityCooperationFocus P37951 FINISHED
Object Indo-Pacific stability LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Indo-Pacific stability | Statement: [Australia–Japan relations, securityCooperationFocus, Indo-Pacific stability]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityCooperationFocus
Context triple: [Australia–Japan relations, securityCooperationFocus, Indo-Pacific stability]
  • A. securityCooperationFormat
    Indicates the type or structure of collaborative security arrangements or mechanisms established between entities.
  • B. securityCollaboration chosen
    Indicates a cooperative relationship in which entities work together to plan, implement, or maintain security measures, policies, or defenses.
  • C. securityCooperatesWith
    Indicates that one security-related entity collaborates or works jointly with another on security matters or activities.
  • D. securityCooperationFrameworkAbbreviation
    Indicates that one entity is the standard abbreviated form of the name or title of a particular security cooperation framework.
  • E. securityDependence
    Indicates a relationship where one entity relies on another to ensure its safety, protection, or defense from threats.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e885b848190bad82c87e9525486 completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd19f791f48190bbb6f6047f9ddc59 completed May 7, 2026, 11:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd0df365948190bc9bfc7ffd46acd8 completed May 7, 2026, 10:10 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:13 p.m.