Triple
T36915969
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Japan–United Kingdom relations |
E913045
|
entity |
| Predicate | securityAgreement |
P90911
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Reciprocal Access Agreement |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Reciprocal Access Agreement | Statement: [Japan–United Kingdom relations, securityAgreement, Reciprocal Access Agreement]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityAgreement Context triple: [Japan–United Kingdom relations, securityAgreement, Reciprocal Access Agreement]
-
A.
securityGuarantee
Indicates a commitment by one party to protect or defend another party against specified threats or risks.
-
B.
securedAgainst
Indicates that one entity is protected or safeguarded against threats, risks, or harmful actions originating from another entity or source.
-
C.
rightsAgreementSignedWith
Indicates that a formal rights agreement has been executed and signed between two parties.
-
D.
securityArrangementPartner
Indicates a relationship where one entity is a partner or participant with another in a security arrangement, such as an agreement or collaboration related to protection, risk management, or safeguarding assets.
-
E.
defenseAgreement
chosen
Indicates the existence of a formal or informal pact in which parties commit to support or protect each other in matters of defense or security.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e885b848190bad82c87e9525486 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd0d0ba5c48190bddb3f0e6637544c |
completed | May 7, 2026, 10:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd0c4324a8819086c90adf46216e0e |
completed | May 7, 2026, 10:03 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:13 p.m.