Triple
T36846070
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tuapeka |
E910549
|
entity |
| Predicate | formerElectorate |
P85908
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tuapeka (New Zealand electorate) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tuapeka (New Zealand electorate) | Statement: [Tuapeka, formerElectorate, Tuapeka (New Zealand electorate)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formerElectorate Context triple: [Tuapeka, formerElectorate, Tuapeka (New Zealand electorate)]
-
A.
previousElectorate
chosen
Indicates that one electorate served as the earlier or former electoral district associated with another electorate.
-
B.
wasElectorate
Indicates that one entity functioned as the electorate (voting body or constituency) for another entity, such as an office, position, or representative.
-
C.
electoralBodyPreviouslyKnownAs
Indicates that an electoral body was formerly known by a different official name before being renamed or reconstituted.
-
D.
successorElectorate
Indicates that one electorate directly follows and replaces another in an official sequence or succession.
-
E.
elector
Indicates a relationship where one entity has the right or role to choose or vote for another entity in an election or selection process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e7f65a881908651b702da592b6d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00b6199c348190b1e90375f737d026 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a00b5169a7881909a07167c4188731f |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:40 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:13 p.m.