Triple
T36830125
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Siksiká dialect |
E910115
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | variety of the Blackfoot language |
C64440
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: variety of the Blackfoot language Context triple: [Siksiká dialect, instanceOf, variety of the Blackfoot language]
-
A.
variety of the Ho-Chunk language
A variety of the Ho-Chunk language is a distinct regional or social form of Ho-Chunk characterized by systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, and/or grammar while remaining mutually intelligible with other forms.
-
B.
Chinookan language variety
A Chinookan language variety is a specific form or dialect of the Chinookan language family traditionally spoken by Indigenous Chinookan peoples of the Pacific Northwest, characterized by its own phonological, grammatical, and lexical features.
-
C.
variety of the Boro language
A variety of the Boro language is a regional or social form of Boro distinguished by systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, or grammar while remaining mutually intelligible with other Boro forms.
-
D.
variety of the Bunun language
A variety of the Bunun language is a distinct regional or social form of Bunun characterized by systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, and grammar while remaining mutually intelligible with other Bunun varieties.
-
E.
variety of the Karbi language
A variety of the Karbi language is a distinct regional or social form of Karbi characterized by systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, or grammar while remaining mutually intelligible with other forms.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e7e9d60819092442fba73290a46 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:13 p.m.