Triple

T36826486
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject São Brás E910023 entity
Predicate equivalentSaint P127976 FINISHED
Object Saint Blaise NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Saint Blaise | Statement: [São Brás, equivalentSaint, Saint Blaise]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: equivalentSaint
Context triple: [São Brás, equivalentSaint, Saint Blaise]
  • A. equivalentIn
    Indicates that two entities are considered logically or functionally the same in meaning, status, or effect within a given context.
  • B. equivalentInReligion
    Indicates that two entities share the same or an essentially identical religious affiliation, tradition, or classification.
  • C. equivalentTo
    Indicates that two entities represent the same concept, value, or state, and can be treated as interchangeable in the given context.
  • D. equivalentInPantheon
    Indicates that two deities from different mythological systems are considered counterparts or functional equivalents within their respective pantheons.
  • E. équivalentLiturgique chosen
    Indicates that two religious entities are considered liturgically equivalent, serving the same or an interchangeable role within liturgical practice.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e7e9d60819092442fba73290a46 completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7ca9c9ef88190b71bcc6f5b4a6182 completed May 3, 2026, 10:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7c89b528c8190bf80b230fc7c7108 completed May 3, 2026, 10:13 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:13 p.m.