Triple

T36821933
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Oohenumpa Lakota E909907 entity
Predicate hasSacredLanguageUse P33427 FINISHED
Object ceremonial Lakota language LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ceremonial Lakota language | Statement: [Oohenumpa Lakota, hasSacredLanguageUse, ceremonial Lakota language]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSacredLanguageUse
Context triple: [Oohenumpa Lakota, hasSacredLanguageUse, ceremonial Lakota language]
  • A. sacredLanguageStatus
    Indicates that a language holds a recognized sacred or liturgical status within a religious or spiritual tradition.
  • B. hasClericalLanguage
    Indicates that something is expressed using formal, religious, or church-related language or terminology.
  • C. hasSacredNarrative
    Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is associated with a sacred or religiously significant narrative related to another entity.
  • D. hasSacredText
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a particular sacred or religious text.
  • E. usedForReligiousLanguage chosen
    Indicates that something is employed specifically in the context of religious language, such as for expressing, communicating, or performing religious beliefs, practices, or rituals.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e7dd13c81908c60b05adb49eeb5 completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcda3699948190adb57625bae08091 completed May 7, 2026, 6:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcd8fd16d08190b0aca6e19a632e99 completed May 7, 2026, 6:25 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:13 p.m.