Triple

T3679495
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Curt Flood E78075 entity
Predicate plaintiffIn P47083 FINISHED
Object Flood v. Kuhn E379586 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Flood v. Kuhn | Statement: [Curt Flood, plaintiffIn, Flood v. Kuhn]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Flood v. Kuhn
Context triple: [Curt Flood, plaintiffIn, Flood v. Kuhn]
  • A. Flood v. Kuhn chosen
    Flood v. Kuhn is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case in which baseball player Curt Flood challenged Major League Baseball’s reserve clause and its long-standing antitrust exemption.
  • B. Lucas v. Earl
    Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
  • C. Ray v. Blair
    Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
  • D. Henry v. Hodges
    Henry v. Hodges is a federal court case challenging state bans on same-sex marriage, decided alongside other landmark marriage equality cases prior to Obergefell v. Hodges.
  • E. Argersinger v. Hamlin
    Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: plaintiffIn
Context triple: [Curt Flood, plaintiffIn, Flood v. Kuhn]
  • A. partyTypePlaintiffs
    Indicates the classification or category of the parties serving as plaintiffs in a legal action.
  • B. accusedIn
    Indicates that a person or entity is formally charged with wrongdoing in a particular case, proceeding, or context.
  • C. defendant
    Indicates that an entity is the party accused or sued in a legal action or proceeding.
  • D. complainant chosen
    Indicates that an entity is the person or party who makes a complaint or brings a grievance against another entity.
  • E. coDefendant
    Indicates that two or more parties are jointly named and involved as defendants in the same legal case or proceeding.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85e18c1c8190be8aafb227f39f48 completed March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adc49039308190b33082e2b58aa5cf completed March 8, 2026, 6:48 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b4cde8bc5081909cfaa4a391b8aca1 completed March 14, 2026, 2:54 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adb84be1fc81909721c871babb4633 completed March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:25 p.m.