Triple
T3679495
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Curt Flood |
E78075
|
entity |
| Predicate | plaintiffIn |
P47083
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Flood v. Kuhn |
E379586
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Flood v. Kuhn | Statement: [Curt Flood, plaintiffIn, Flood v. Kuhn]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Flood v. Kuhn Context triple: [Curt Flood, plaintiffIn, Flood v. Kuhn]
-
A.
Flood v. Kuhn
chosen
Flood v. Kuhn is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case in which baseball player Curt Flood challenged Major League Baseball’s reserve clause and its long-standing antitrust exemption.
-
B.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
C.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
D.
Henry v. Hodges
Henry v. Hodges is a federal court case challenging state bans on same-sex marriage, decided alongside other landmark marriage equality cases prior to Obergefell v. Hodges.
-
E.
Argersinger v. Hamlin
Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: plaintiffIn Context triple: [Curt Flood, plaintiffIn, Flood v. Kuhn]
-
A.
partyTypePlaintiffs
Indicates the classification or category of the parties serving as plaintiffs in a legal action.
-
B.
accusedIn
Indicates that a person or entity is formally charged with wrongdoing in a particular case, proceeding, or context.
-
C.
defendant
Indicates that an entity is the party accused or sued in a legal action or proceeding.
-
D.
complainant
chosen
Indicates that an entity is the person or party who makes a complaint or brings a grievance against another entity.
-
E.
coDefendant
Indicates that two or more parties are jointly named and involved as defendants in the same legal case or proceeding.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85e18c1c8190be8aafb227f39f48 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc49039308190b33082e2b58aa5cf |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:48 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b4cde8bc5081909cfaa4a391b8aca1 |
completed | March 14, 2026, 2:54 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adb84be1fc81909721c871babb4633 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:25 p.m.