Triple
T36789866
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IC3 algorithm |
E909020
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | safety model checking algorithm |
C26935
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: safety model checking algorithm Context triple: [IC3 algorithm, instanceOf, safety model checking algorithm]
-
A.
model checking technique
chosen
A model checking technique is a formal verification method that systematically explores all possible states of a system model to automatically determine whether it satisfies specified correctness properties.
-
B.
logic for concurrent systems
Logic for concurrent systems is a formal framework for specifying and reasoning about the behaviors, interactions, and correctness properties of systems in which multiple processes execute and communicate simultaneously.
-
C.
work on program verification
Work on program verification involves developing and applying formal methods to mathematically prove that software systems satisfy their specified correctness, safety, and security properties.
-
D.
formal verification technique
A formal verification technique is a mathematically rigorous method used to prove or disprove the correctness of a system’s design or implementation with respect to a specified formal specification or property.
-
E.
SMT solver competition
An SMT solver competition is an organized event where different Satisfiability Modulo Theories solvers are benchmarked and compared on standardized problem sets to evaluate and advance the state of the art in automated reasoning.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e7a937c81909ed7359641e670f6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:12 p.m.