Triple
T36789732
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IC3: Incremental Construction of Inductive Clauses for Indubitable Correctness |
E909017
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | SAT-based verification algorithm |
C26934
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: SAT-based verification algorithm Context triple: [IC3: Incremental Construction of Inductive Clauses for Indubitable Correctness, instanceOf, SAT-based verification algorithm]
-
A.
method in Satisfiability Modulo Theories
A method in Satisfiability Modulo Theories is a procedure or algorithmic step used by an SMT solver to determine the satisfiability of logical formulas with respect to one or more background theories (such as arithmetic, arrays, or bit-vectors).
-
B.
SAT solver
A SAT solver is a computational tool that determines whether there exists an assignment of truth values to variables that makes a given Boolean formula evaluate to true.
-
C.
work on program verification
Work on program verification involves developing and applying formal methods to mathematically prove that software systems satisfy their specified correctness, safety, and security properties.
-
D.
SMT solver competition
An SMT solver competition is an organized event where different Satisfiability Modulo Theories solvers are benchmarked and compared on standardized problem sets to evaluate and advance the state of the art in automated reasoning.
-
E.
formal verification technique
chosen
A formal verification technique is a mathematically rigorous method used to prove or disprove the correctness of a system’s design or implementation with respect to a specified formal specification or property.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e7a937c81909ed7359641e670f6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:12 p.m.