Triple

T36778164
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Love to Dream E908689 entity
Predicate vocalProductionStyle P108283 FINISHED
Object layered vocals LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: layered vocals | Statement: [Love to Dream, vocalProductionStyle, layered vocals]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: vocalProductionStyle
Context triple: [Love to Dream, vocalProductionStyle, layered vocals]
  • A. artisticVocalStyle chosen
    Indicates a relationship where an entity’s vocal performance is characterized by a particular artistic style or expressive manner of singing or speaking.
  • B. introducedVocalStyleOf
    Indicates that one entity initiated or brought into use the vocal style characteristic of another entity.
  • C. hasVocalStyleComparedTo
    Indicates a comparison between entities based on the similarity or resemblance of their vocal style.
  • D. vocalConfiguration
    Indicates how an entity’s vocal or sound-producing characteristics are arranged or specified in relation to another entity or context.
  • E. hasHookVocalStyle
    Indicates that an entity (typically a musical work or performance) features a distinctive, catchy vocal delivery or refrain intended to serve as a memorable hook.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e798aa08190ace31098d1b13e9f completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fb563aec448190875410fb1a3ed624 completed May 6, 2026, 2:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fb35b9ede881908aaae93a215525df completed May 6, 2026, 12:36 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:12 p.m.