Triple
T36764050
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Motorola C121 |
E908285
|
entity |
| Predicate | compatibleProject |
P194538
|
FINISHED |
| Object | OsmocomBB |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: OsmocomBB | Statement: [Motorola C121, compatibleProject, OsmocomBB]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: compatibleProject Context triple: [Motorola C121, compatibleProject, OsmocomBB]
-
A.
compatibleStand
Indicates that one entity can be properly supported or held by another entity’s stand or mounting system.
-
B.
compatibleSign
Indicates that two entities are considered astrologically harmonious or well-matched based on their zodiac signs.
-
C.
compatiblePayload
Indicates that one entity can be safely or effectively used as the payload of another entity without conflict or required modification.
-
D.
notCompatibleWith
Indicates that two entities cannot function together properly or are unsuitable for joint use or interaction.
-
E.
compatibleClient
Indicates that one entity can function correctly and reliably as a client when interacting with another entity, according to defined compatibility criteria.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e786ba481909cdcf6cf6b39dd32 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd783fed9c81909e792702636c4f1f |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:44 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd7788e63c81909de22fdafcfe41c0 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:41 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fd783e9e5c819087dec7fefa03700d |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:44 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:12 p.m.