Triple

T36760971
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Stiffbeards E908198 entity
Predicate hasGeographicSpecificity P196027 FINISHED
Object unspecified in primary texts LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unspecified in primary texts | Statement: [Stiffbeards, hasGeographicSpecificity, unspecified in primary texts]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasGeographicSpecificity
Context triple: [Stiffbeards, hasGeographicSpecificity, unspecified in primary texts]
  • A. isGeographicallySpecific
    Indicates that something is limited to or uniquely associated with a particular geographic location or area.
  • B. hasGeographicType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or classified by a specific type or category of geographic feature or area.
  • C. geographicRelevance
    Indicates that something has a meaningful connection or applicability to a specific geographic area or location.
  • D. hasGeographicBasis
    Indicates that something is grounded in, derived from, or defined by a particular geographic location or area.
  • E. hasGeographicalLocation
    Indicates that an entity is situated in, or associated with, a specific geographical place or area.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e779bec8190be0e1f87a131e0f4 completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe00dad1708190b6522476bebb43af completed May 8, 2026, 3:27 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fdfc3717f48190bb50ac2919c8ef95 completed May 8, 2026, 3:07 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe00d8d8248190a63c12aa2c2f7c0c completed May 8, 2026, 3:27 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:12 p.m.