Triple
T36741776
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Creek Indian territory |
E907637
|
entity |
| Predicate | landCededThrough |
P36684
|
FINISHED |
| Object | treaties with the United States |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: treaties with the United States | Statement: [Creek Indian territory, landCededThrough, treaties with the United States]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: landCededThrough Context triple: [Creek Indian territory, landCededThrough, treaties with the United States]
-
A.
wasCededAfter
Indicates that control or ownership of one entity was formally transferred to another entity following a specified event or point in time.
-
B.
requiredTerritorialCessionBy
Indicates that one party is obligated to transfer control or ownership of territory to another party.
-
C.
leasedLandFor
Indicates that one party has granted another party the right to use a piece of land for a specified period under a lease agreement.
-
D.
cededLandFor
chosen
Indicates that one party transferred control or ownership of land to another party, typically as part of an agreement, treaty, or settlement.
-
E.
earlierCessionInTreaty
Indicates that one party transferred or ceded something to another at an earlier point within the sequence of cessions specified in a treaty.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e76d10881909ec1679bc043108c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7c9f5a8848190ba956ff27f44e396 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7c8999a348190abc1895eaa6e036d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:13 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:12 p.m.