Triple
T36732608
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Site B |
E907380
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedForInFiction |
P50195
|
FINISHED |
| Object | genetic engineering experiments |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: genetic engineering experiments | Statement: [Site B, usedForInFiction, genetic engineering experiments]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedForInFiction Context triple: [Site B, usedForInFiction, genetic engineering experiments]
-
A.
usedInFictionalWork
Indicates that something (such as a concept, object, or character) appears or is employed within a specific fictional work.
-
B.
fictionalUse
chosen
Indicates that one entity makes use of another within a fictional or imaginary context, rather than in real-world usage.
-
C.
worksUnderInFiction
Indicates that, within a fictional context or narrative, one character or entity is hierarchically subordinate to and takes direction from another.
-
D.
createsInFiction
Indicates that one entity is the creator or originator of another entity within a fictional or narrative context.
-
E.
worksWithInFiction
Indicates that two fictional characters are depicted as collaborating, interacting, or being associated with each other within a narrative work.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e75aa6881909b844d00a3888ee5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd4f39b5008190b83b3227ce22c509 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:49 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd4df17c548190a4e2a6fea70f7e10 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:12 p.m.