Triple
T36720529
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PEP 618 |
E907044
|
entity |
| Predicate | addsKeywordArgumentTo |
P186192
|
FINISHED |
| Object | zip(strict=...) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: zip(strict=...) | Statement: [PEP 618, addsKeywordArgumentTo, zip(strict=...)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: addsKeywordArgumentTo Context triple: [PEP 618, addsKeywordArgumentTo, zip(strict=...)]
-
A.
keyArgument
Indicates that an entity plays a central or primary argumentative role within a larger discourse, claim, or reasoning structure.
-
B.
argumentOf
Indicates that one entity functions as an argument (participant or operand) in relation to another entity, such as a predicate, event, or expression.
-
C.
addsConcept
Indicates that one entity introduces or incorporates a new concept into another entity, such as a model, document, or knowledge structure.
-
D.
argumentType
Indicates that one entity serves as a specific semantic or syntactic argument role (such as subject, object, or complement) in relation to another entity or event.
-
E.
usedInArgumentFor
Indicates that something (such as a statement, piece of evidence, or concept) is employed as support within an argument advocating for a particular claim or position.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e746e4c8190a0d05cc6d57a643e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7c843f4cc8190884430b8e9236117 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7c4796ebc819084a0dc08505e5f14 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:56 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7c776b4088190bef550c869da530d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:08 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:12 p.m.