Triple

T36718818
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mazinaw River E906988 entity
Predicate hasGeologicalSignificanceVia P195986 FINISHED
Object Mazinaw Lake NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mazinaw Lake | Statement: [Mazinaw River, hasGeologicalSignificanceVia, Mazinaw Lake]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasGeologicalSignificanceVia
Context triple: [Mazinaw River, hasGeologicalSignificanceVia, Mazinaw Lake]
  • A. hasGeologicalSignificance
    Indicates that something possesses notable importance or relevance within a geological context, such as Earth’s structure, history, or processes.
  • B. hasGeologicalNature
    Indicates that something possesses a specific geological character, composition, or formation type.
  • C. hasGeologicalEvidenceOf
    Indicates that there is geological data or features supporting the existence, occurrence, or impact of a specified phenomenon or event.
  • D. hasGeomorphologicalInterest
    Indicates that something possesses notable geomorphological features or characteristics that make it of scientific or conservation interest.
  • E. leftGeologicalRemnant
    Indicates that one entity has caused or resulted in a remaining geological feature or residue in or on another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e73ad108190a5241585f2303e9a completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fdfbafe32081909c62653ff4fc155c completed May 8, 2026, 3:05 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fdf64db4a881908f8250e24ae3cefb completed May 8, 2026, 2:42 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fdfbae00e481908a2e4558b9dee07e completed May 8, 2026, 3:05 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:12 p.m.