Triple
T3671872
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Twelver Shia |
E77897
|
entity |
| Predicate | viewOnImams |
P50083
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Imams are sinless |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Imams are sinless | Statement: [Twelver Shia, viewOnImams, Imams are sinless]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: viewOnImams Context triple: [Twelver Shia, viewOnImams, Imams are sinless]
-
A.
viewOnHadith
Indicates a relationship where an entity holds a particular interpretive stance, opinion, or evaluative perspective regarding a specific hadith.
-
B.
hasImam
Indicates that an entity is associated with, led by, or served by a particular imam in a religious or community context.
-
C.
viewOnWeakHadith
Indicates the stance or judgment someone holds regarding the use, acceptance, or treatment of weak (da‘if) hadith.
-
D.
viewOnIjtihad
Indicates a stance or perspective an entity holds regarding the practice or principle of ijtihad (independent legal reasoning in Islamic jurisprudence).
-
E.
viewOnCaliphate
Indicates a stance, opinion, or perspective that an entity holds regarding the concept, legitimacy, or role of a caliphate.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85e083008190b2e1b7085fe500bd |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc42de1bc819090e19dd0805f13a1 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adb84a20288190a092e4a1b045fe3f |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69adb8e4ba948190a9b777cf7f788b96 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:59 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:25 p.m.