Triple
T36711882
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Communications Compatibility and Security Agreement |
E906814
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | bilateral military communications pact |
C42371
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: bilateral military communications pact Context triple: [Communications Compatibility and Security Agreement, instanceOf, bilateral military communications pact]
-
A.
bilateral military agreement
chosen
A bilateral military agreement is a formal pact between two states that outlines mutual defense commitments, security cooperation, and related military obligations and activities.
-
B.
bilateral diplomatic agreement
A bilateral diplomatic agreement is a formal, negotiated arrangement between two sovereign states that defines mutual rights, obligations, and cooperative actions in specific areas of shared interest.
-
C.
military base agreement
A military base agreement is a formal arrangement between a host nation and a foreign state that defines the rights, responsibilities, and conditions under which the foreign state may establish, operate, and maintain military facilities on the host nation’s territory.
-
D.
collective defense agreement
A collective defense agreement is a formal pact among multiple states committing each to consider an attack on one member as an attack on all and to respond with coordinated defense measures.
-
E.
political-military alliance
A political-military alliance is a formal agreement between two or more states to coordinate their defense and foreign policies, often including mutual security guarantees and joint military planning.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e73ad108190a5241585f2303e9a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:12 p.m.