Triple
T36691127
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Toshiba MG Series |
E905957
|
entity |
| Predicate | reliabilityTarget |
P88032
|
FINISHED |
| Object | high MTBF |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high MTBF | Statement: [Toshiba MG Series, reliabilityTarget, high MTBF]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reliabilityTarget Context triple: [Toshiba MG Series, reliabilityTarget, high MTBF]
-
A.
hasReliabilityGoal
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with or assigned a specific reliability-related objective or target.
-
B.
reliabilityCharacteristic
Indicates that one entity specifies or embodies a reliability-related property, feature, or performance attribute of another entity.
-
C.
reliabilityHigherThan
Indicates that one entity is considered to have greater reliability than another entity.
-
D.
reliabilityScope
Indicates the extent or context within which something’s reliability or dependability is defined, evaluated, or guaranteed.
-
E.
reliabilityRecord
Indicates that there exists a record or documentation capturing the reliability characteristics, performance, or history associated with an entity or relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e70d2448190bdd3ce781ba971c5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7c7e6b3f481909ad2b44e11f578f2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7c4796ebc819084a0dc08505e5f14 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:56 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:12 p.m.