Triple
T36690352
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1999 Israeli legislative election |
E905936
|
entity |
| Predicate | leadingAllianceComponents |
P186168
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Israeli Labor Party |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Israeli Labor Party | Statement: [1999 Israeli legislative election, leadingAllianceComponents, Israeli Labor Party]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: leadingAllianceComponents Context triple: [1999 Israeli legislative election, leadingAllianceComponents, Israeli Labor Party]
-
A.
leadingAlliance
Indicates that one entity holds the primary leadership role or dominant guiding influence within an alliance involving other entities.
-
B.
allianceBrandOf
Indicates a relationship where one brand is part of, or operates under, a broader alliance or group brand.
-
C.
allianceDesign
Indicates a cooperative relationship in which entities jointly plan, structure, or establish the framework of an alliance.
-
D.
allianceHubFor
Indicates that one entity serves as a central coordinating hub or focal point for an alliance involving another entity.
-
E.
allianceIntegration
Indicates the process or state of multiple allied entities coordinating and combining their capabilities, structures, or operations into a more unified and interoperable whole.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e70d2448190bdd3ce781ba971c5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7c83f5960819089610ed39c839678 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7c4796ebc819084a0dc08505e5f14 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:56 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7c776b4088190bef550c869da530d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:08 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:12 p.m.