Triple

T36684195
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Third Part E905770 entity
Predicate hasLegalScope P25835 FINISHED
Object realm of Castile NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: realm of Castile | Statement: [Third Part, hasLegalScope, realm of Castile]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalScope
Context triple: [Third Part, hasLegalScope, realm of Castile]
  • A. hasRegulationScope
    Indicates that a regulation applies to, or governs, a specified scope, domain, or area of relevance.
  • B. hasLegalSubjectArea
    Indicates that something (such as a document, case, or rule) pertains to or is classified under a particular area of law.
  • C. legalScope chosen
    Indicates the range, boundaries, or extent of authority, applicability, or effect that something has under a particular legal framework or rule.
  • D. hasScope
    Indicates that one entity defines, limits, or encompasses the range, extent, or applicability within which another entity operates or is valid.
  • E. hasLegalSubject
    Indicates that an entity serves as the legal subject (e.g., rights-holder or obligated party) in a legal relationship or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e7011dc819082b324f18b756a1b completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe6c811bcc81908b1e1b1f8bcb071b completed May 8, 2026, 11:06 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe6c026d5481908b7a814dcf38c183 completed May 8, 2026, 11:04 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:12 p.m.