Triple
T36654640
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sméagol |
E904955
|
entity |
| Predicate | lostRingTo |
P97514
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bilbo Baggins |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bilbo Baggins | Statement: [Sméagol, lostRingTo, Bilbo Baggins]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lostRingTo Context triple: [Sméagol, lostRingTo, Bilbo Baggins]
-
A.
laterFinderOfRing
chosen
Indicates that the subject is a subsequent individual who comes into possession of or discovers the ring after an earlier finder.
-
B.
lostTo
Indicates that one entity was defeated by another in a competition, conflict, or comparison.
-
C.
lostWith
Indicates that one entity experienced a loss or defeat in conjunction with, or as part of the same side/team as, another entity.
-
D.
lostOn
Indicates that one entity was defeated by or failed against another entity in a competitive or comparative context.
-
E.
lostIn
Indicates that an entity has become unable to find its way or is no longer in control or possession within a particular place, situation, or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e6e3b908190970251b30f76ad71 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7c777e924819081a6634f549fe552 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7c477a4d481908f52e55b6688f60c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:56 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.