Triple

T36649039
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Assimilative Crimes Act E904787 entity
Predicate keyIssueInInterpretation P141368 FINISHED
Object whether a federal statute already covers the conduct at issue LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: whether a federal statute already covers the conduct at issue | Statement: [Assimilative Crimes Act, keyIssueInInterpretation, whether a federal statute already covers the conduct at issue]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: keyIssueInInterpretation
Context triple: [Assimilative Crimes Act, keyIssueInInterpretation, whether a federal statute already covers the conduct at issue]
  • A. isKeyIssueFor chosen
    Indicates that something is a primary or central concern, problem, or topic of importance for a particular entity, context, or situation.
  • B. intendedInterpretation
    Indicates that one entity is meant to be understood or interpreted in a particular way, sense, or meaning relative to another.
  • C. keySaying
    Indicates that an entity is a notable or characteristic saying, phrase, or quotation associated with another entity.
  • D. keyClue
    Indicates that something serves as an essential hint or piece of information needed to understand, solve, or unlock another related element.
  • E. disputedInterpretation
    Indicates that there is disagreement or contention over how something should be understood, interpreted, or explained.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e6d3a3c81909db73eda9e0516bd completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7c777e924819081a6634f549fe552 completed May 3, 2026, 10:08 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7c477a4d481908f52e55b6688f60c completed May 3, 2026, 9:56 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.