Triple
T36631589
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kulfa language |
E904333
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sara language |
C48970
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Sara language Context triple: [Kulfa language, instanceOf, Sara language]
-
A.
Sara language variety
chosen
The Sara language variety is a group of closely related Central Sudanic languages spoken primarily in southern Chad and neighboring regions, characterized by shared phonological and grammatical features but distinct local dialects.
-
B.
Sara dialect
The Sara dialect is a regional or community-specific variety of the Sara language characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features that differentiate it from other related dialects or standard forms.
-
C.
Saka language
The Saka language is an extinct Eastern Iranian language once spoken by the Saka (Scythian) peoples of Central Asia, known primarily from Khotanese and Tumshuqese manuscript traditions.
-
D.
Batanic language
The Batanic language is a subgroup of Austronesian languages spoken primarily in the Batanes Islands of the northern Philippines and nearby areas, characterized by shared phonological and lexical features distinct from neighboring Philippine languages.
-
E.
Sambalic language
A Sambalic language is a member of a subgroup of the Austronesian language family spoken primarily by the Sambal and related ethnolinguistic groups in western Central Luzon, Philippines.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e6c63e48190b1d0c3a79a6c7406 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.