Triple

T36631372
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sara–Bagirmi languages E904325 entity
Predicate areMutuallyIntelligibleToSomeExtent P7448 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Sara–Bagirmi languages, areMutuallyIntelligibleToSomeExtent, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: areMutuallyIntelligibleToSomeExtent
Context triple: [Sara–Bagirmi languages, areMutuallyIntelligibleToSomeExtent, true]
  • A. areMutuallyIntelligibleToSomeDegree chosen
    Indicates that two or more languages or communication systems can be at least partially understood by each other’s users without prior learning or translation.
  • B. lessMutuallyIntelligibleThan
    Indicates that the level of mutual intelligibility between one pair of languages (or language varieties) is lower than that between another pair.
  • C. areMutuallyIntelligibleWithSerer
    Indicates that two languages can be understood by Serer speakers and vice versa without prior specialized study.
  • D. coversMutuallyUnintelligibleVarieties
    Indicates that the relationship involves a linguistic variety encompassing two or more other varieties whose speakers cannot understand each other.
  • E. hasLanguageSimilarTo
    Indicates that one entity uses or is associated with a language that is similar or closely related to the language used or associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e6c63e48190b1d0c3a79a6c7406 completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7c777e924819081a6634f549fe552 completed May 3, 2026, 10:08 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7c477a4d481908f52e55b6688f60c completed May 3, 2026, 9:56 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.