Triple
T36625763
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nelson–Oppen combination method |
E904163
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | satisfiability decision procedure |
C59749
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: satisfiability decision procedure Context triple: [Nelson–Oppen combination method, instanceOf, satisfiability decision procedure]
-
A.
SAT solver
A SAT solver is a computational tool that determines whether there exists an assignment of truth values to variables that makes a given Boolean formula evaluate to true.
-
B.
SMT solver competition
An SMT solver competition is an organized event where different Satisfiability Modulo Theories solvers are benchmarked and compared on standardized problem sets to evaluate and advance the state of the art in automated reasoning.
-
C.
decidable theory
A decidable theory is a formal theory for which there exists an effective procedure (algorithm) that, given any sentence in its language, can determine in finite time whether that sentence is a theorem of the theory.
-
D.
SMT-LIB family
The SMT-LIB family is a standardized collection of logical theories, syntactic constructs, and benchmark formats designed to specify and exchange Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) problems across different solvers.
-
E.
framework in automated theorem proving
chosen
A framework in automated theorem proving is a structured environment of algorithms, data structures, and interfaces that coordinates the representation of logical formulas, the application of inference rules, and the management of proof search to automatically derive or verify theorems.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e6ae750819096911e6e2d4d12c5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.